RNR Home

RNR Archives

RNR Help

Below is the newest installation of Research News Reporter (RNR) Online. Each month a new edition will be posted.  Previous editions can be viewed in the Archives.  

 

July 2003

IWPR’s Research News Reporter is distributed monthly to highlight inventive, informative, innovative, and sometimes controversial research relating to women and their families.  Each selection includes a short description of the research and either a link to the report itself or a citation of where the report can be accessed. 

1.  40-Hour Work Proposal Significantly Raises Mothers’ Employment Standard
June 2003

Institute for Women’s Policy Research
Vicky Lovell

This Research-in-Brief examines the implications of the new 40-hour-a-week, year-round work requirement that Congress is considering for TANF recipients.  The author finds that while three-quarters of mothers do work for pay, only two-fifths of mothers work the year-long 40-hours-a-week schedule that Congress would require under this pending legislation.  Clearly such an increase would require poor mothers to make difficult choices between work, child care, and poverty. 

http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/D457.pdf

 

2.  Why Congress Should Ignore Radical Feminist Opposition to Marriage
June 2003
The Heritage Foundation
Patrick F. Fagan, Robert E. Rector, and Lauren R. Noyes

This report, written in support of President Bush’s initiative to promote marriage as a means to escape poverty, traces the rise of “radical feminism” and the “habitual radical feminist hostility” to marriage itself.  The authors argue that marriage will help lift poor single mothers and their children out of poverty, and Congress should therefore support marriage promotion as an integral part of welfare reauthorization. 

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Family/bg1662.cfm

The Heritage Foundation report cites a number of activists and researchers who have actively sought to have marriage promotion removed from welfare legislation.  Below are a selection of reports by researchers who were singled out by the Heritage Foundation as anti-marriage, (including IWPR’s own Avis Jones-DeWeever). 

Marriage Promotion and Low-Income Communities: An Examination of Real Needs and Real Solutions
June 2002
Institute for Women’s Policy Research
Avis Jones-DeWeever

http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/d450.pdf

Statement in Opposition to Promotion of Marriage As a Public Policy Strategy for Ending Women’s Poverty
May 2002

Center for Women Policy Studies

http://www.centerwomenpolicy.org/leg.cfm?StatementID=2

Testimony for Senate Finance Committee Hearing: “Issues in TANF Reauthorization: Building Stronger Families”
May 16, 2003
Working for Equality and Economic Liberation
Kate Kahan

http://finance.senate.gov/hearings/testimony/051602kktest.pdf

 

3.  Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results from a Multisite Case Control Study
July 2003
American Journal of Public Health
Jacquelyn C. Campbell, et al.

This report identifies risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships.  The authors of the 11-city study find a number of expected factors were associated with increased risk of femicide, including the perpetrator’s access to a gun and his estrangement from the victim.  However, the authors also find that the male partner’s employment status is the most important related demographic factor.  This finding has important implications during the current economic downturn.

This report is available in the July edition of the American Journal of Public Health, which can also be purchased online at:

http://www.ajph.org/content/vol93/issue7/index.shtml

 

4.  Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America
2003
The Urban Institute
Edward G. Goetz

In this book, the author examines policy attempts to deconcentrate poor urban residents by dispersing subsidized housing in an attempt to solve a range of low-income problems associated with a high concentration of urban poor.  Using Minneapolis-St.Paul as a model, the author examines the complicated processes and unforeseen results that such a program instigates and explores the many sides of this contentious issue.

To order this book online, visit http://www.urban.org/pubs/clearing/index.html, or call 1-877-847-7377.

 

5.  Does Amount of Time in Child Care Predict Socioemotional Adjustment?
July/August 2003
Child Development
National Institute of Child and Human Development (NICHD) 

Morning to Afternoon Increases in Cortisol Concentrations for Infants and Toddlers at Child Care: Age Differences and Behavioral Correlates
July/August 2003
Child Development
Sarah E. Watamura, Bonny Donzella, Jan Alwin, and Megan R. Gunnar

This pair of studies published in the journal Child Development will likely spark more controversy in the debate over the effects that child care has on children’s emotional and physical health.  The NICHD study, part of the largest long-term study of child care in the United States, finds that the more time that children spend in child care, the more likely they were to have behavior problems, such as aggression.  The other study finds that children have higher levels of cortisol, a stress hormone, when they were in child care than the days when they were home. 

These studies are available in the July/August edition of Child Development, which can be purchased online at:
http://www.srcd.org/cd.html

The New York Times also wrote an article on these studies, which can be found on LexisNexis: 

Turning a Mass of Data on Child Care Into Advice for Parents
July 22, 2003
The New York Times
Susan Gilbert