Unemployment & the Economy
![]() |
About
ResourcesPublicationsMultimedia |
|---|
About Unemployment & the Economy
IWPR publishes occasional analyses of the impact of the business cycle on women’s employment outcomes. Between December 2007 and June 2009, the U.S. economy was in the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Because much of the slowdown has occurred in traditionally male fields such as manufacturing and construction—while a few traditionally female fields such as health and education have shown job growth or minimal job loss—many reports have focused on the job losses among men in the labor force. IWPR highlighted that:
- Substantial job losses have also occurred among women in such sectors as retail, hospitality, and personal and business services. Women lost about 2 million jobs between December 2007 and June 2009 and unemployment was 8.4 percent of women aged 16 and over as of November 2010.
- Once they lose their jobs, women and men spend a similar number of weeks unemployed; in December 2009, unemployed women and men had been out of work for an astounding 29 weeks, on average.
- A smaller share of unemployed women collect unemployment insurance benefits compared with unemployed men. Between December 2007 and November 2009, 36.8 percent of unemployed women received unemployment benefits, on average, compared with 40.3 percent of unemployed men.
Resources
Women's and Men's Employment and Unemployment in the Great Recession
Are Women Now Half the Labor Force? The Truth about Women and Equal Participation in the Labor Force
Unemployment Among Single Mother Families
Visit our external resources page for more information on this topic.
To see our experts on this and other initiatives, click here.
Latest Reports from IWPR
|
|
Slow and Positive Job Growth for Women and Men Continues in April According to IWPR analysis of the May employment report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), job growth continued in April with 115,000 jobs added to nonfarm payrolls. In April, women gained 84,000 jobs (nearly three-quarters of jobs added) and men gained 31,000. |
|
|
|
Job Growth Slows for Women and Men in March |
|
|
|
Job Growth Slows for Women and Men in March |
|
|
|
Improved Job Growth in January for Both Women and Men: Women Re-Entering the Labor Force, But Men Leaving According to an Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) analysis of the February employment report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, job growth improved in January with 243,000 jobs added to nonfarm payrolls. In January, women gained 95,000 jobs (almost 40 percent, above their share for the past year) and men gained 148,000. |
|
|
|
Equal Job Growth for Women and Men in Last Quarter of 2011: Women Continue to Leave the Labor Force According to IWPR analysis of the January employment report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, job growth was moderate in December with 200,000 jobs added to nonfarm payrolls. |
|
|
|
Slow Job Growth in November for Both Women and Men Job growth remained slow in November with 120,000 jobs added to nonfarm payrolls. This is up slightly from 100,000 new jobs in October, but down from 210,000 addedin September. |
|
|
|
Is the Recovery Starting for Women? Slow Job Growth in October for Both Women and Men. Job growth slowed in October with 80,000 jobs added to nonfarm payrolls. This is down from 104,000 new jobs in August and 158,000 in September. (September’s gains included more than 40,000 Verizon workers returning after a strike. August and September’s totals were revised by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in November). Women’s employment now appears to be rising. In October women gained 66,000 jobs, but men gained only 14,000. The revised numbers for August and September show 136,000 new jobs for women compared with 126,000 for men. |
|
|
|
Slow Job Growth in September Points to Need for Federal Help with Job Creation |
|
|
|
Recommendations for Improving Women’s Employment in the Recovery In the current economic recovery, women are facing a gap in employment that jeopardizes the well-being and economic security of themselves and their families. This briefing paper, prepared by a group of scholars and researchers collaborating as the Women Scholars Forum, proposes specific strategies to meet the needs of women facing joblessness in the recovery from the Great Recession of 2007–2009. This group, noting that women’s earnings are essential to the welfare of their families, is especially concerned that federal programs reach those most in need, including single mothers, women of color, and those with less education. The members of the Women Scholars Forum, listed below, offer these recommendations in order to achieve job growth and economic prosperity. |
#C384, Briefing Paper, 5 pages
$5.00
|
|
|
The Job Loss Tsunami of the Great Recession: Wave Recedes for Men, Not for Women |
|
|
|
Monthly Number of Women and Men on Payrolls (Seasonally Adjusted), December 2007- April 2011 |
|
|
|
Monthly Number of Women and Men on Payrolls (Seasonally Adjusted), December 2007– February 2011 |
|
|
|
Women and Men’s Employment and Unemployment in the Great Recession |
#C373, Briefing Paper, 67 pages
$5.00
|
|
|
The Workforce Investment Act and Women’s Progress: Does WIA Funded Training Reinforce Sex Segregation in the Labor Market and the Gender Wage Gap? |
#C72, Briefing Paper, 8 pages
$5.00
|
|
|
Unemployment Among Single Mother Families Women who maintain families without a spouse present are almost twice as likely as married men to be unemployed, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for August 2009. One of every eight women (12.2 percent) who are the sole breadwinners in their families is unemployed compared with one of every sixteen married men. |
#C369, fact sheet, 4 pages
$5.00
|
| Preview not available |
The Impact of the Current Economic Downturn on Women Testimony presented to the Joint Economic Committee At the hearing: “The Employment Situation: May 2008” June 6, 2008 |
|
|
|
Women at Greater Risk of Economic Insecurity: A Gender Analysis of the Rockefeller Foundation’s American Worker Survey In February 2007, at the request of the Rockefeller Foundation, the consulting firm Yankelovich fielded a survey to explore Americans’ sense of economic insecurity. The Institute for Women’s Policy Research analyzed the survey data to explore impacts based on gender, racial and ethnic identity, education, employment status, and other important demographic characteristics. This report highlights IWPR’s findings. |
#D482, report, 27 pages
$10.00
|
| Preview not available |
Women and the Economy: Recent Trends in Job Loss, Labor Force Participation, and Wages In the months since the official end of the recession in November 2001, women’s employment has returned to pre-recession levels, but the lack of job growth in this period means millions of jobs for women are missing. At the same time, the long-term increase in women’s labor force participation has stalled, and the gender wage gap has increased. |
#B245, 6 pages
$10.00
|
|
|
Florida’s Unemployment Insurance System: Barriers to Program Adequacy for Women, Low-Wage and Part-Time Workers, and Workers of Color, Executive Summary (Written collaboratively by Vicky Lovell, PhD, Institute for Women’s Policy Research, and Maurice Emsellem, Esq., National Employment Law Project) The Florida unemployment insurance (UI) system is not meeting its basic goal of providing a modest measure of income support to temporarily unemployed workers. This is due in significant part to the UI system’s failure to keep pace with fundamental changes in the labor market, including the growth of low-wage and parttime work and the vastly expanding role of women in the labor market. This situation exists despite the significant reserves in Florida’s UI trust fund, even during the current economic downturn, and record-level UI tax cuts. |
#C356, 2 pages
$5.00
|
|
|
40-hour Work Proposal Significantly Raises Mothers’ Employment Standard |
#D460, Research-in-Brief, 8 pages
$5.00
|


