<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/initiatives/media/press-on-pay-equity-discrimination/RSS">
  <title>Press on Pay Equity &amp; Discrimination</title>
  <link>http://www.iwpr.org</link>

  <description>
    
      IWPR press releases and media citations related to Pay Equity &amp; Discrimination.
    
  </description>

  

  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2011-01-11T06:51:02Z</syn:updateBase>
        

  <image rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/logo.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/the-white-house2019s-use-of-data-on-the-gender-wage-gap-june-5-2012"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-get-paid-less-than-men-for-the-same-work-april-30-2012"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/americas-gender-wage-gap-april-17-2012"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-still-confront-yawning-gender-wage-gap-study-april-17-2012"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/pay-gap-persists-in-female-dominated-career-fields-april-17-2012"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/opinion-women-need-a-2018ledbetter-moment2019-for-equal-pay"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/the-most-unfair-cities-to-be-a-working-woman-gender-pay-gap-by-the-numbers-april-13-2012"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/should-you-know-your-coworker2019s-salary"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/tell-your-co-workers-how-much-you-earn"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/five-myths-about-why-women-earn-less-than-men"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/10-industries-where-women-earn-less-than-men"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-closing-the-job-wage-divide"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-releases/pay-secrecy-and-paycheck-fairness-new-data-shows-pay-transparency-needed"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/white-house-promotes-economic-efforts-for-women"/>
      
      
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-still-lagging-men-in-salaries"/>
      
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/the-white-house2019s-use-of-data-on-the-gender-wage-gap-june-5-2012">
    <title>The White House’s Use of Data on the Gender Wage Gap (June 5, 2012)</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/the-white-house2019s-use-of-data-on-the-gender-wage-gap-june-5-2012</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i>"For people interested in more information, the <b>Institute for Women’s  Policy Research</b> has put together a handy guide showing some of the  differences between some of the data sets."</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2012-06-08T20:11:19Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-get-paid-less-than-men-for-the-same-work-april-30-2012">
    <title>Women Get Paid Less than Men for the Same Work (April 30, 2012)</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-get-paid-less-than-men-for-the-same-work-april-30-2012</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><a name="top"> </a></p>
<p class="mark"><a name="top"><span class="speaker">DR. HEIDI HARTMANN, INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH:</span> <span class="speaker">You're welcome. It's a pleasure. Thank you.</span></a></p>
<p><a name="top">
<p class="mark"><span class="speaker">MADDOW:</span> <span class="speaker">I know that you at the  <span>women</span> 's --  <span>Institute for Women's Policy Research</span> , you have done some of the most important and most highly publicized  work on this issue. Is there any way that the idea of a gender- based  disparity is something that depends on how you look at it? Is this  something other than a blunt truth about the  <span>American economy</span> ?</span></p>
<p class="mark"><span class="speaker">HARTMANN:</span> <span class="speaker">Well, I mean, you obviously have by far the better part of the argument. You've got the  <span>Census Bureau</span> and I might mention, the  <span>Bureau of Labor Statistics</span> agreeing with you. Oh, also, I could mention, the  <span>U.S. General Accountability Office</span> . I think what the issue is for the  <span>Republicans</span> is that they believe that that's not -- no matter how big the  <span>wage gap</span> is almost none of it is due to discrimination. And, of course, these numbers from  <span>BLS</span> and  <span>Census Bureau</span> are not really talking about discrimination. But the  <span>GAO</span> study that I just mentioned did. They said that even when you put  everything you can possibly think of in the regression equations, the  statistical analyses to try to make that gap go away, you can't explain  at least 20 percent of it. Now, most other studies place the part you  can't explain as a quarter to a half. So, a large part of the gap  probably is due to discrimination. But that seems to be what the debate  is. And, you know, when you ask can the  <span>Republicans</span> convince  <span>women</span> they don't live in the  <span>real world</span> ? Probably not, because almost every survey that's ever been done of working  <span>women</span> , when you asked them about their job, like 95 percent say my biggest  <span>problem</span> on the job is lack of  <span>equal pay</span> .</span></p>
<p class="mark"><span class="speaker">MADDOW:</span> <span class="speaker">In terms of just making it very clear, what you were talking about there about doing a  <span>statistical regression</span> analysis on these things, controlling for other factors -- I spent a long time going through the  <span>Republican side</span> of this argument today just trying to understand how you could look at  these very blunt numbers and come up with the opposite truth. What  you're saying basically is when you control for things like the  <span>number</span> of hours worked, you're still getting a gender based pay disparity that is not explained by working a different  <span>number</span> of hours?</span></p>
<p class="mark"><span class="speaker">HARTMANN:</span> <span class="speaker">Right. Exactly. I mean,  <span>Alex</span> seemed to believe if you put in working a different  <span>number</span> of hours that would explain it. No, far from it. If you look at all  workers and male and female in the economy, we know, let's say, during  the childbearing years, about a third of  <span>women</span> may be working  <span>part time</span> . So count  <span>part time</span> . Count how much  <span>women</span> work. OK. I'm working  <span>part time</span> . Only making $400 a week. Compare it to all the men, more of whom are working  <span>full time</span> . You still get a wage ratio of 72 percent. So that means that that 77  percent isn't going to move very much if you suddenly remove the people  where the men are working 44 and the  <span>women</span> are only making 40. No. The  <span>number</span> of hours explains a very small part of it. I mean, these  <span>regression analysis</span> , they include  <span>occupation</span> . They include your education,  <span>number</span> of years of experience, maybe sometimes marital status,  <span>number</span> of children -- just about anything you can think of. And you cannot  make the whole gap go away. So there is discrimination. Now, those  studies aren't even in a way counting the sex segregation that you  opened your presentation with this evening. Those studies try to hold  <span>occupation</span> constant. You have the data up there  <span>occupation</span> by  <span>occupation</span> . We have some equal  <span>occupations</span> . You mentioned  <span>police officers</span> and sheriffs.  <span>Women</span> are only like 1 percent behind there. Amazing. But you go to financial  managers, they're 26 percent behind. So, it is different within each  <span>occupation</span> . But maybe why  <span>women</span> don't go into police as much and go into nursing more is also  discrimination. So, even the exercise of trying to decide how much of  <span>wage gap</span> is due to discrimination and how much isn't is -- that's open to interpretation. That's why in  <span>Canada</span> , for example, when they talk about the  <span>wage gap</span> between  <span>women</span> and men, they would use a  <span>number</span> comparable to that 72 percent figure I gave you. They would use a  <span>number</span> that says, well, look, at how much difference men and  <span>women</span> earn in the labor market. I mean, if we believe men and  <span>women</span> are equally competent, equally capable, also have to live and eat and  support their families, we should be wanting a society where that gap is  zero, where a man and woman are making the same amount.</span></p>
<p class="mark"><span class="speaker">MADDOW:</span> <span class="speaker">How to get to zero seems like where -- that's where I thought we were on  <span>policy</span> . Everybody agreed there was a gap, we're trying to get to zero, let's  fight about how we all get there, with all the ideological biases and  all the different places we come from. Instead to be denying that the  gap is there has blown by mind. Dr.  <span>Hartmann</span> , founder and president of the  <span>Institute</span> for  <span>Women</span> 's  <span>Police Research</span> --  <span>thank you very much</span> for joining us and helping us understand this. I really appreciate it.</span></p>
<p class="mark"><span class="speaker">HARTMANN:</span> <span class="speaker">You're welcome.</span></p>
<p class="mark"><span class="speaker">MADDOW:</span> <span class="speaker">All right.  <span>General Motors</span> is alive and  <span>Osama bin Laden</span> is dead -- all thanks to  <span>Mitt Romney</span> , turns out. Exactly how that is possible, coming up.</span></p>
</a></p>
<p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2012-05-04T12:35:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/americas-gender-wage-gap-april-17-2012">
    <title>America's gender wage gap (April 17, 2012) </title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/americas-gender-wage-gap-april-17-2012</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i><b>"Full-time working women in America earned only 82.2% of men's median weekly earnings last year, according to a new <a href="../../publications/pubs/the-gender-wage-gap-by-occupation-1">report</a> by the Institute for Women's Policy Research, <span class="st">a think-tank in Washington,  DC.</span> Women earned less than men in almost all occupations. Only in the  fields of "stock clerks and order fillers" and "bookkeeping, accounting  and auditing clerks" did women make slightly more than their male  counterparts. The gender wage gap (women’s earnings as a percentage of  men’s) was most pronounced amongst CEOs and financial managers.  Female chief executives earned only 69% as much as male bosses,  resulting in $658 less in median weekly earnings."</b></i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T18:30:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-still-confront-yawning-gender-wage-gap-study-april-17-2012">
    <title>Women Still Confront Yawning Gender Wage Gap - Study (April 17, 2012) </title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-still-confront-yawning-gender-wage-gap-study-april-17-2012</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i><span id="articleText"><span class="focusParagraph"> </span></span></i></p>
<p><i>"In most common occupations women still make less than men doing the same job for an equal amount of hours, according to new data released on Tuesday.</i></p>
<p><i> <span id="midArticle_0"> </span> </i></p>
<p><i>Overall they earn 77 cents for each dollar made annually by men and in some professions such as financial managers the number drops to 66 cents.</i></p>
<p><i> <span id="midArticle_1"> </span>
<p><b>"These gender wage gaps are not about women choosing to work less than men - the analysis is comparing apples to apples, men and women who all work full time - and we see that across 40 common occupations, men nearly always earn more than women," said Ariane Hegewisch, a study director at the Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR), a non-profit research organization.</b></p>
<b><span id="midArticle_2"> </span></b>
<p><b>She added that the reasons are varied but discrimination law cases show that women are less likely to be selected for the best jobs, they get hired at a lower rate and don't get equivalent raises to men over the years.</b></p>
<b><span id="midArticle_3"> </span></b>
<p><b>"Discrimination in who gets hired for the best jobs hits all women but particularly black and Hispanic women," Hegewisch explained."</b></p>
</i></p>
<p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T18:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/pay-gap-persists-in-female-dominated-career-fields-april-17-2012">
    <title>Pay Gap Persists in Female-Dominated Career Fields (April 17, 2012)</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/pay-gap-persists-in-female-dominated-career-fields-april-17-2012</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i>"Tuesday marked Equal Pay Day, a day established in 1996 to symbolize  how long it takes women to earn the same wages that men earned last  year. However, a new study shows that the concept the day was founded on  hasn't yet caught on, even in fields where women are a majority of the  workforce.</i></p>
<p><b><i>According to a study done by the Institute for Women's Policy  Research, among the 20 most popular occupations for women workers, they  only out-earn men in one field: bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing  clerks.  Among secretaries and administrative assistants, women make up  96 percent of workers but earn 86 percent as much as men. Likewise,  women account for 85 percent of maids and housekeepers and make only 83  percent of what men in that profession earn. A majority of financial  managers are women—54.3 percent—but they earn only about 66 percent of  what men in that occupation make.</i></b></p>
<p><b><i>"Women are less likely to be hired into the most lucrative jobs,  and—when they work side by side with men—they may get hired at a lower  rate and receive lower pay increases over the years," says Ariana  Hegewisch, study director at the Institute for Women's Policy Research  and one of the study's co-authors."</i></b></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T18:25:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/opinion-women-need-a-2018ledbetter-moment2019-for-equal-pay">
    <title>Opinion: Women Need a ‘Ledbetter Moment’ for Equal Pay</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/opinion-women-need-a-2018ledbetter-moment2019-for-equal-pay</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i>"Everyone seems to be <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/03/20/142529/in-idaho-governors-cabinet-women.html">at a loss to explain the difference, including the governor</a>.  But one thing is clear: Gould is not the only woman experiencing the  negative impact of the pay gap. The problem goes beyond both state lines  and career choice. From the corner office to the corner store,  hard-working women often take home paychecks that are less than fair.</i></p>
<p><i><b>And with the secrecy shrouding paychecks, many women don’t even know that they’re victims. According to the <a href="../press-releases/pay-secrecy-and-paycheck-fairness-new-data-shows-pay-transparency-needed">Institute for Women’s Policy Research</a>,  61% of employees in the private sector are either discouraged or  prohibited from discussing wages and benefits.</b> Besides, shouldn’t we  assume that almost 50 years after President John F. Kennedy signed the  Equal Pay Act, paycheck fairness would have caught up with the law?"</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T18:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/the-most-unfair-cities-to-be-a-working-woman-gender-pay-gap-by-the-numbers-april-13-2012">
    <title>The Most Unfair Cities to be a Working Woman: Gender Pay Gap by the Numbers (April 13, 2012)</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/the-most-unfair-cities-to-be-a-working-woman-gender-pay-gap-by-the-numbers-april-13-2012</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i>"<b>Ariane Hegewisch, a study director for the<a href="../../" target="_blank"> Institute for Women’s </a><a href="http://www.forbes.com/policy/">Policy</a> Research with a particular eye on the pay gap says that in addition to  the old boy’s club of the financial services industry, there are some  cultural distinctions in Connecticut that play into the massive divide  between men and women’s earnings in the state. “Connecticut has a high  wage gap overall,” she says, “There are some traditional gender  distributions at play.” She explains that better off women with  highly-compensated partners often tend to work part-time or in lower  earning jobs by choice rather than out of necessity.</b>"</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2012-04-13T18:50:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/should-you-know-your-coworker2019s-salary">
    <title>Should you know your coworker’s salary?</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/should-you-know-your-coworker2019s-salary</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i>"Sharing salary details has long been one of the great taboos in Corporate America, ranking even higher on the list of 'what not to do at work' than getting drunk at the company Christmas party or crying during your performance review. But for more and more employees, it’s not just an office no-no. <b>A <a href="../../publications/pubs/pay-secrecy-and-wage-discrimination" target="_blank">new paper</a> by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (hat tip to <a href="http://www.bnet.com/blog/business-research/tell-your-co-workers-how-much-you-earn/1802" target="_blank">Leadership Lab</a>) found that almost half of all workers in the U.S. 'are either contractually forbidden or strongly discouraged from discussing their pay with their colleagues,' making it harder for employees to discover whether they’re being discriminated against or not.</b>"</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2011-07-06T19:40:32Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/tell-your-co-workers-how-much-you-earn">
    <title>Tell Your Co-Workers How Much You Earn </title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/tell-your-co-workers-how-much-you-earn</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>"<i><b>According to the <a href="../../">Institute for Women’s Policy Research</a>, the pay gap between men and women is about 23 percent. But in the public sector, the pay gap between men and women is only 11 percent. In <a href="../../">a new paper</a>, the Institute takes a look at both public and private sector jobs and comes up with an intriguing suggestion about how to eliminate much of the pay gap in the private sector: make salary information publicly available."</b></i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2011-07-06T13:46:41Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/five-myths-about-why-women-earn-less-than-men">
    <title> Five Myths About Why Women Earn Less Than Men</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/five-myths-about-why-women-earn-less-than-men</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i><b>1. Women earn less because they enter low-paying fields and become moms.</b></i></p>
<p><i><b>While it’s true that men tend to enter higher-paying fields than women, that difference alone does not explain the gender wage gap. Even when they work in the same occupations, men earn more. For instance, the median weekly salary for full-time male pharmacists was $1,954 in 2009, compared to $1,475 for female pharmacists, <a href="../../publications/pubs/the-gender-wage-gap-by-occupation">according to the Institute for Women’s Policy Research</a>. And men even earn more than women in traditionally female-dominated occupations. For example, full-time female registered nurses earned an average of $1,035 per week, whereas men earned $1,090 — or an extra $2,860 per year.</b></i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2011-04-13T14:22:46Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/10-industries-where-women-earn-less-than-men">
    <title>10 Industries Where Women Earn Less Than Men</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/10-industries-where-women-earn-less-than-men</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i>"Do men conspire to keep the pay of the women at low levels? No evidence indicates that this has occurred. What about the theory that senior management purposely keeps men's pay higher? There is little proof of this either, though several legal cases make this claim.</i></p>
<p><i><b>'Alas, no one has those data, as companies tend to be very secretive about this," says Arian Hegewisch, Study Director at IWPR. "The best information in theory might be sex discrimination law cases against specific companies, but even there, unless cases are litigated by the EEOC, typically wage and salary data are kept under wraps.'"</b></i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2011-04-13T14:18:45Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-closing-the-job-wage-divide">
    <title>Women Closing the Job, Wage Divide</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-closing-the-job-wage-divide</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div>
<div style="text-align: left; ">
<p><i>"Are women poised to surpass men economically? Feminist economists, who understand the complexities of the situation, are not making predictions.</i></p>
<p><i><b>'We have this little roadblock for women,' said Heidi Hartmann, president of the Institute for Women's Policy Studies: 'We haven't figured out how to get men pregnant.'</b></i></p>
<p><i>Her quip highlights the biological edge that favors men in the workplace: Many women take time off work to raise children while men continue to accumulate pay and promotions."</i></p>
<span><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/30/BU501GV6P1.DTL#ixzz1AB3uFp8B"></a></span></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2011-01-05T16:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-releases/pay-secrecy-and-paycheck-fairness-new-data-shows-pay-transparency-needed">
    <title>Pay Secrecy and Paycheck Fairness: New Data Shows Pay Transparency Needed</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-releases/pay-secrecy-and-paycheck-fairness-new-data-shows-pay-transparency-needed</link>
    <description>New survey data from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) shows, for the first time, the extent of pay secrecy at workplaces on a national level.</description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Washington, DC—New survey data from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) shows, for the first time, the extent of pay secrecy at workplaces on a national level. The Paycheck Fairness Act (PFA), an update to the Equal Pay Act of 1963, has been scheduled for a vote on Wednesday, November 17 in the U.S. Senate. The act is designed to provide greater levels of wage transparency, allowing employees to discover instances of employer discrimination.<br /><br />“It took Lilly Ledbetter most of a decade to find out that she was being paid less than men doing the same job,” said Heidi Hartmann, President of IWPR. “With the ability to ask about other workers’ pay, she might have discovered the wage discrimination far earlier, and could have sought a remedy without fear of recrimination.”<br /><br />The survey of 2,700 adults found that 19 percent of employees say they work in a setting where discussions of wages and salaries are “formally prohibited, and/or employees caught discussing wage and salary information could be punished.” Another 31 percent of workers reported that discussion of wage and salary information “is discouraged by managers.” Wage and salary information is “public” for 27 percent of employees and the information “can be discussed” by an additional 16 percent of employees. An additional 7 percent did not know whether such discussions were permitted (Figure 1).<br /><br />The survey was performed for IWPR by Precision Opinion with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation during September and October of 2010. The survey data were weighted to represent the national population distribution.<br /><br />Pay secrecy is much more common in the private sector. In the private sector, 61 percent of employees are either discouraged or prohibited from discussing wage and salary information, whereas only 14 percent of public sector employees reported that pay discussions were either discouraged or prohibited (Figure 2).<br /><br />“The gender wage gap in the federal government—with high levels of pay transparency—is only 11 percent,” said Barbara Gault, Vice President and Executive Director of IWPR. “The gender wage gap in the economy as a whole is 23 percent. Pay secrecy is part of the reason for this difference, and the Paycheck Fairness Act could help.”<br /><br />Figure 1. ASK IF EMPLOYED: In some workplaces, information on co-worker wages and salaries is publically available, while in others a policy may state that wage and salary information is private, and that employees can be punished for discussing pay with each other. Where would you say your workplace fits here?</p>
<p><br />Source: Survey of Economic Security (2010) conducted by IWPR with support from the Rockefeller Foundation.<br />Figure 2. Percentage of workers who report that discussion of wage information is discouraged or prohibited by employer sector.<br />Source: Survey of Economic Security (2010) conducted by IWPR with support from the Rockefeller Foundation.<br /><br /><i>The Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) conducts rigorous research and disseminates its findings to address the needs of women and their families, promote public dialogue, and strengthen communities and societies. IWPR is a 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt organization that also works in affiliation with the women's studies and public policy programs at The George Washington University.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>news release</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2010-11-28T22:15:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Release</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/white-house-promotes-economic-efforts-for-women">
    <title>White House Promotes Economic Efforts for Women</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/white-house-promotes-economic-efforts-for-women</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i>"As one of its closing arguments before the midterm elections, the Obama administration is highlighting the impact its economic policies have had on women.</i></p>
<p><i>A 32-page <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/10/21/jobs-and-economic-security-americas-women-report" title="National Economic Council Web site.">report</a> released Thursday by the National Economic Council, a policy coordination arm of the White House, described scores of policies that it said had promoted women’s economic security.</i></p>
<p><i>Some economists who reviewed the report said the administration needed to go further.</i></p>
<p><i><b>Heidi Hartmann, president of the Institute for Women's Policy Research, said: 'Nobody’s opposed to getting the deficit down in the long run, but we don’t want it to happen too soon because we’re still recovering from a very deep recession. We need to raise government revenues, we don’t need to cut entitlements.</b>'”</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2010-11-04T18:20:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>


  <item rdf:about="http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-still-lagging-men-in-salaries">
    <title>Women still lagging men in salaries</title>
    <link>http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-clips/women-still-lagging-men-in-salaries</link>
    <description></description>
    <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><i><b>Heidi Hartmann, president of the Institute for Women's Policy Research, said she's been studying the pay-gap issue so long that she's generally pleased any time the gap narrows. But when she tells young women about it, they're always shocked and wonder why it's not rectified immediately.  "It's a question of how fast you think it should go," she said. But even she's been distressed at the slow pace since 1995. "We should have seen more progress in the past 15 years."</b></i></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>iwpr</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>
    
      <dc:subject>employment-edu-econ</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>press clip</dc:subject>
    
    
      <dc:subject>pay equity-discrimination</dc:subject>
    
    <dc:date>2010-11-03T16:05:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:type>Press Clip</dc:type>
  </item>





</rdf:RDF>
